New words – 18 November 2019

facial fingerprint noun [C]
UK /ˌfeɪ.ʃᵊl.ˈfɪŋ.gə.prɪnt/ US /ˌfeɪ.ʃᵊl.ˈfɪŋ.gɚ.prɪnt/
the pattern of lines and other markings on someone’s face that is different in every person and can be used for identification purposes

Unless you have an unshakeable faith in the incorruptibility of our own state – which, judging by the wider mood, most of us don’t – it seems bafflingly reckless to offer up your face to be logged. Yet more than 150 million people, so far, have downloaded FaceApp. Millions more have handed over their facial fingerprints in order to unlock their smartphones more easily, or to activate Apple’s cute little Animojis.
[www.telegraph.co.uk, 18 July 2019]

smart dust noun [U]
UK /ˈsmɑːt.dʌst/ US /ˈsmɑːrt.dʌst/
very small and light wireless devices that can float in the air like dust particles, used in smart computer technology

Smart dust is coming and when it fully arrives it will change the world as we know it. Think of wireless devices being the size of just a grain of sand but which are packed with cameras, sensors and other forms of communication able to transmit data. This is the future of technology.
[www.disclose.tv, 2 October 2018]

brainjacking noun [U]
/ˈbreɪn.dʒæk.ɪŋ/
the crime of using illegal hacking methods to access someone’s neurostimulator (= a device that has been implanted in their brain to treat an illness) and so be able to control their thoughts and behaviour

Because neurostimulators are technology-based, they share the same vulnerabilities of any technology. As a result, cybersecurity and “brainjacking” could become a concern. Hackers with malicious intent may have the ability to access brain implants and glean information, change memories, stimulate bad memories, or instigate potentially fatal attacks on a person.
[breckinc.com, 19 February 2019]

About new words

7 thoughts on “New words – 18 November 2019

  1. Trung Kien Do

    We have “footprint” and “fingerprint”, so why don’t we have something like “faceprint” instead of “facial fingerprint”??

    1. Food

      Because neologisms aren’t made logically, but instead by the first person to get popular. This is also an attempt to give credit to a technology without proving it first. We trust in fingerprints, our legal system thinks of them as immutable evidence, hence “facial fingerprint” trying to pretend that there is a level of truth in biometrics that there isn’t.

    2. Andrea Ray

      Er, because fingerprints and footprints are made by flat-planting the body part onto a flattish surface.
      Surely you don’t _faceplant_ onto a flat surface?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.