by Kate Woodford and Dom Glennon
Are you annoyed by song lyrics that do not obey the rules of grammar? Do you correct them as you sing along? To mark the inclusion of English Grammar Today on Cambridge Dictionaries Online, we thought we’d count down some of the worst offences against the rules of grammar committed by songwriters, either deliberately, or without knowing.
5. The standard non-standard
Rock’n’roll has always been drawn to the rebellious side of life, so it’s little surprise that a large number of songs feature non-standard or slang grammar in their lyrics: double negatives such as ‘We Don’t Need No Education’ (‘Another Brick In The Wall’ by Pink Floyd) and ‘I Can’t Get No Satisfaction’ (‘Satisfaction‘ by The Rolling Stones). Some musicians go even further, adding in the equally non-standard ‘ain’t’, as in ‘Ain’t No Sunshine’ by Bill Withers, and ‘You Ain’t Nothing But a Hound Dog’ (‘Hound Dog‘ by Elvis Presley).
Perhaps the best example of deliberate breaking of the rules is in Louis Jordan’s ‘Is You Is Or Is You Ain’t My Baby?’, guaranteed to send your Word grammar-checker haywire. The non-standard seems almost standard in rock music.
4. Pronoun Trouble
Whether to use ‘I’ or ‘me’ after ‘and’ is something that even native speakers of English struggle with. The rule is actually quite simple: ‘take away the preceding noun and ‘and’ and use the form of the pronoun that you would use in that context (so eg Kate and I are going to France this year, but It’s easy for Johnny and me) – and yet somehow it can trip up even the most careful of speakers. But there’s no excuse for songwriters to get it wrong – is there? Take this line from The Doors’ ‘Touch Me’:
Till the stars fall from the sky, for you and I
For I, Jim? Bringing things a little more up to date, Lady Gaga makes the same error in the song ‘You and I’, when she sings:
Oh, yeah, I’d rather die
Without you and I
Gaga, a serial offender, is guilty of the reverse error in the song ‘Bad Romance’, with this line:
You and me could write a bad romance.
Me could write a bad romance? If only she could pay as much attention to her pronouns as she does to her outfits…
3. You wouldn’t let it lay
Moving on to a different type of error, what was Bob Dylan thinking in the song, ‘Lay Lady Lay’ when he invited his lady to ‘lay across’ his ‘big brass bed’? Surely Bob Dylan knew the rule? You lie on a surface. (intransitive) You lay a person or a thing on a surface. (transitive) Or perhaps not?
Eric Clapton also ignored – or was not aware of – this grammar rule while co-writing his 1977 song, ‘Lay Down Sally’.
2. How many ‘in’s?
At no. 2, we have one of the more famous examples – a phrase from the theme song of the 1973 James Bond film Live and Let Die, written by Paul and Linda McCartney:
And if this ever-changing world in which we live in / Makes you give in and cry / Say live and let die.
The phrase ‘in which we live in’, should, of course, be either ‘in which we live’, or ‘which we live in’ – you can’t have ‘in’ in both positions. But then this wouldn’t have scanned (= had the right number of syllables for the line). So did the McCartneys add the extra ‘in’ thinking no one would notice? Were they even aware of their mistake? Did they, in fact, ever write this incorrect lyric? Asked about the line many years later, McCartney said he couldn’t quite remember what he’d written, but added that he thought it was probably, ‘in which we’re livin’’, which is, of course, perfectly correct. We’ll let you be the judge.
1. Dreams aren’t made of this
And the award for the most egregious lyrical error of all time goes to [drum roll]… Alicia Keys! In her anthemic ode to New York, Empire State of Mind, Ms Keys describes this famous city as:
Concrete jungle where dreams are made of
Oh Alicia, relative clauses can be tricky things, but ‘where dreams are made of’? It should be either ‘which dreams are made of’ or ‘where dreams are made’. But maybe ‘which dreams’, with the consonant sounds of ‘ch’ followed by ‘d’, doesn’t ‘flow’ as nicely when sung, and the preposition ‘of’ at the end of the line is needed to make it scan.
Do you know any ungrammatical, or otherwise nonsensical, lyrics that make you see red? Let us know?
16 thoughts on “The Top 5 Ungrammatical Song Lyrics”
The Brooklyn Bridge, led by Johnny Maestro, did a song called The Worst That Could Happen. In it, Maestro sings “if he really loves you more than me”. That really makes me cringe.
Actually, the issue here is not grammar but meaning. The sentence as written means “if he really loves you more than [he loves] me.” Replacing “me” with “I” involves a different omitted verb and a different meaning: “If he really loves you more than I [love you].” I don’t know the song, so I can’t tell which is correct.
To have been grammatically correct, it should have been “I”. That is was written “me” completely changed the meaning of the sentence.
This is terribe for a non-native English speaking person. Imagine when I listen to the radio and hear those sentences that make me question my English language knowledge (“My baby don’t care for me”. Don’t? Doesn’t?).
I hope you wrote this tongue in cheek. These are after all only song lyrics, allowing for ‘poetic licence’.
I believe that the divide between poetic license and grammatical error is a very, very thin line, and should be walked with care. For instance, the lay-lie confusion is very common (not only among song writers, alas! also authors have been known to incur in it) and I don’t think it has anything to do with poetic license. I once commented on such a mistake in the lyrics of a song that had to do with language, no less, and got my head bashed in by other commenters, brandishing the poetic license bat, so now I mostly abstain from pointing these things out. Sometimes lyrics wilfully reflect a certain manner of speech (“Aint misbehavin’ ” would be another such case) and there, I feel that no objections should be raised, other than tongue-in-cheek, as is the case of the examples mentioned under No. 5 of the above list. In any case, thank you for an entertaining post.
Bob Dylan is American and in American English lay is used as he uses it in the song. It is not a matter of incorrectness. The double negative is used deliberately and effectively in the two songs cited; this is clearly a case of poetic licence, Some kinds of double negative are acceptable by the way, e.g. “it’s not unusual” which is also a song title, and funnily enough the song does contain a clanger when it goes on to state that “it’s not unusual to be loved by anyone”. Should be “someone”. Now there is a good example of a grammatical train wreck!
Finally. Someone know about double negative
Reblogged this on Tuyentranslate.
What about Bob Dylan’s famous song..
“I ain’t goin’ work on Maggie’s farm no more”
I’d always taken that to be a shortened form of ‘gonna’, which is already shortened from ‘going to’…
Alicia is not in the wrong. The lyric is:
“…concrete jungle where dreams are made, oh, there’s nothing you can’t do.”
So if you listen, it’s “oh” and not “of,” which doesn’t stop hundreds of lyrics sites from misquoting. Also never stopped me from signing it wrong anyway.
Pingback: Tiếng anh “cố tình dưới chuẩn” dùng trong lời bài hát | LUYỆN TIẾNG ANH
An English Teacher was educating her class on the subject of double negatives. When she said there was no such thing as a double positive, some smartass at the back of the class said, “Yeah, Right”!
Imany’s “Don’t be so shy” is partly embarrassing even to me, as a non native speaker (Swede)..
In the Beatles’ “Nowhere Man,” John Lennon’s lyric includes “Knows not where he’s going to” and “Just sees what he wants to see.”